Yes, unless use of single IRB review is a funder or sponsor requirement. For sites that choose not to rely on the reviewing IRB, their own IRB can review and approve the study in accordance with their usual procedures, or a commercial or alternative external IRB can be used.
Articles in this section
- V3.0 transition: key dates
- Is joining the 3.0 Agreement required?
- I want to learn more about Version 3.0. Where should I go to find out more about the new agreement?
- Does my institution need to sign the Version 3.0 indemnification provision to join Version 3.0?
- Check an institution's V3.0 status
- Does Version 3.0 include flexibility like Version 2.0 and 1.0?
- How do sites determine whether the SMART IRB SOPs will be used?
- What happens to existing V1.0/V2.0 studies?
- Can sites that choose not to rely on the Reviewing IRB still participate in the study?
- How does HIPAA work under Version 3.0?
Comments
0 comments
Article is closed for comments.