Yes, unless use of single IRB review is a funder or sponsor requirement. For sites that choose not to rely on the reviewing IRB, their own IRB can review and approve the study in accordance with their usual procedures, or a commercial or alternative external IRB can be used.
Articles in this section
- When did SMART IRB Version 3.0 Reliance Agreement launch?
- Is joining the SMART IRB Version 3.0 Agreement required?
- When did Joinder and Online Reliance System go off-line?
- I want to learn more about Version 3.0. Where should I go to find out more about the new agreement?
- Does my institution need to sign the Version 3.0 indemnification provision to join Version 3.0?
- How do I know if my institution or another institution joined SMART IRB Version 3.0 Agreement and the V3.0 Indemnification Addendum?
- Does Version 3.0 include flexibility like Version 2.0 and 1.0?
- How do sites determine whether the SMART IRB SOPs will be used?
- My institution is a Participating Institution under V2.0 or V1.0. What will happen to my institution’s existing research under Versions 2.0/1.0?
- Can sites that choose not to rely on the Reviewing IRB still participate in the study?
Comments
0 comments
Article is closed for comments.